Abstract

Red is the principal color of the flags of the Soviet Union and China. The communism led by the Soviet Union was expanding fast post WW II intimidating the anti-communist world led by the United States.  Red was used to categorize communist countries such as red Russia, red Romania, red Cuba, red China, etc. Regarding China, the US mainstream media seems to be stubbornly stuck with a red China image despite of the fact that the modern China not only has departed from the Soviet style of communism in the 60’s but also has transformed herself in the past four decades by embracing and experimenting with capitalism and socialism. This article uses color to explain the changing China. To understand China, one must realize that a yellow or a red China is gone forever and the world stands to benefit from a green and a gold China.
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 
As one of the oldest nation on earth, China is a mystery to most people in the world because her five thousand years of history is not well understood by her fellow global citizens. However, living in the same global village today, people and nations must know one another like neighbors to get along and to cherish the neighborhood together in a civilized manner. As a civilized neighborhood, one must know each other, at least everyone's recent history and background, so that everyone can care for each other like civilized neighbors for mutual benefit. To the world, especially Americans, China seems to be ill understood. The modern history of China was scantly taught in American schools. Learning on one's own, unfortunately, Americans get a contradictory presentation colored by political interpretation. 
 
In America today, one gets an overwhelming dosage of messages from a biased and contradictory media that China is rising and doing good on the one hand and being evil and threatening on the other hand. The latter image has been painted by the mainstream media principally because of its lack of understanding of China's modern history and its subjective analyses of China’s behavior. We have discussed numerous times about China's modern history and made objective interpretation with comparison to the US history, but the mainstream media seems to be stubbornly stuck with a red China image, labeling China red based on a legacy - anti-communism strand of foreign policy and explaining whatever China does with red color – an expanding communist threat. This is dangerously wrong because such a bias leads to hostility and confrontation possibly leading to war. Today's column entitled, Yellow, Red, Green and Gold China is written to present a fair image for China.
 
Let's go back to the 19th century. An expanding West was colonizing the world while China's economy was the largest in the world. Qing dynasty had followed Ming Court abandoning all naval activities (recall: General Zheng He in Ming dynasty sailed with a large fleet of giant vessels (5X longer than Columbus' flag ship), exploring Pacific and Indian Oceans seven times.) He determined that the rest of the world was far less civilized than China, hence the Ming Emperor ordered to forbid any future sea exploration. Arrogant and self-indulgent, the Qing court designated yellow as its royal color exhibited by King’s robe and ruled China as if China was the entire world. When the gun boats of the West, including the Americans, came to China, Qing court was defeated and humiliated with numerous unequal treaties. Even a small nation, Japan, was able to crash Qing's hastily assembled navy and forced China to declare Joseon (Today's Korea) to be Japan's interest-territory and ceded Taiwan to Japan (1895). Late nineteenth century was a nightmare for China, wars had driven many Chinese to be refuges to go abroad to make a living despite of a discriminating world awaiting them. Chinese were called 'Yellow' disaster (Negative term, different from ‘Yellow Peril’ or ‘Yellow Terror’ referring to the fear of Asians caused by the Japanese victory in Russo-Japanese War,1904-05 and the Great Genghis Khan, 1162-1227) by the West because of their skin or emperor's robe color. Chinese were not welcomed in America other than being used as coolies (cheap labor). We might call that disgraceful period of China as Yellow China.
 
The awakening of Chinese people was slow and late. The Chinese revolution to build a Republic nation was not smooth as the French or American revolution due to foreign interventions by the Western powers but most devastatingly by Imperialistic Japan and Russia. The American interference was remembered positively by the Chinese for helping her revolution despite the fact that Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919), the President of the U.S., used Chinese territory to settle the Russo-Japanese war. (Roosevelt received the Nobel Peace Prize for his mediation effort. To this day, China has very little respect for the politically motivated Nobel Peace Prize). China's path to Republic has been treacherous and still incomplete as the PRC (Chinese Communist Party (CCP) originally supported by the Soviet) and ROC (the U.S. supported anti-communist government) are governing the Mainland and Taiwan respectively. Despite of China's (PRC) departure from Stalin's communist Soviet Union, China was treated as an enemy under the label of Red China (red being the principal color of the flag of the Soviet Union and China) under the US national anti-communism policy placing China under strict economic sanction for years until the U.S. recognized PRC as the only China in 1979 abandoning the ROC. We might call this period of China as Red China.
 
China has come a long way as a developing nation since 1979 in terms of her standard of living vis-a-vis the developed West. Recognizing the mistakes of experimenting with communist socialism, China embraced capitalism and free trade philosophy but leery of the imperialistic capitalism that had affected China's past. So China under CCP is practicing her own modified capitalism for the benefit of the nation, in-turn benefitting the people. For the past three decades, China's economy has grown very fast, driven by a generation of youthful, entrepreneurial and hardworking people thinking nothing but productivity and making money. China's economy has long surpassed Japan being number two in the world today moving towards number one. China has become confident enough to think green, not just the green buck but a green environment. China is the principal supporter of the Paris Climate Change Control Treaty. China has increased 11,500 square miles of forest annually (2011 UN report). China's industrial innovation has shown the world many green examples. China's super fast charging electric bus implemented in Graz, Austria is an impressive demonstration in the transportation domain alone. (International standard in super fast charging) We might call this period of China, Green China.
 
China's rise is by and large based on her work ethics which is sorely diminishing in America. Some countries (UK and Germany) have recognized China's future and desire to share with that future but some others (Japan and India) have a sour grape mentality, jealousy and resentments. China has made tremendous investment in Africa, America and Europe based on global free trade and co-prosperity concept, different from colonial expansion practiced by the West and Japan backed by military imperialism. The investment in agriculture in Asia, Africa and South America by China has increased farm land use and food production for the world. The One Belt and One Road (OBOR) program proposed by China is an economical development project providing collaborative opportunities for participants. Yet surprisingly, the United States, Japan and India are shying away from the project out of no valid reasons. China’s infrastructure investment in Pakistan, Malaysia, etc., is beneficial to the parties involved. Chinese investments in the U.S. such as purchasing Smithfield foods for $4.7 B, GE Appliances for $5.6 B, Hollywood Legendary Entertainment for $2.6 B, etc., are oddly interpreted as job depriving rather than job preserving foreign investment. Barring some anti-China intervention, China's economy and her investment is literally the engine of global economic development leading to a golden future. We might call this future period of China as Gold China.  
 
China's economy is growing with a healthy 6.5% generating trillions of cash. With this cash, China can invest in a capitalistic manner the same way it had made Western society appearing more civilized and superior. China's capital will change the image of China, from a poor yellow and red China to a vibrant green and gold China. If we make an effort to understand China's history, we would understand that China's behavior is far more benign than the Western colonialism practiced in the 19th and 20th centuries.  Thus there is no reason for the U.S. to take an anti-China policy. Any military confrontation only intensifies China's insecurity resulting in her investment in military strength rather than in world economy. We should realize that China was a great nation and is destined to be a great nation again. China no doubt will continue to invest and provide win-win opportunities beneficial to the world. The U.S. stands to gain and grow with a green and gold China since a yellow or red China is gone forever.

​

Abstract

 A work permit system is tied with immigration policy, industrial and social needs as well as the education system of a country. While China has recognized the need to develop a new work permit system with clear categorization and value points for foreign workers, the government must be cognizant of the changing and reforming nature of industries, societies and education systems from K-12 to tertiary schools. This article presents a glimpse of China’s new work permit system and provides some relevant comments.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
A recent news appeared in international news media about the subject title has caught people's attention. Naturally, foreigners working in China or having interest in working in China are very much alerted by this news. In my recent travel through China and Southeast Asia, I not only had opportunity reading and hearing this news piece, but I also had occasions talking to some people including taxi drivers, students, business people and foreigners who are currently working in China. Yes, there is definitely some anxiety for some people who very much like to work in China for various reasons such as love of China's culture, the country’s social fiber, people’s spirit, the language, etc. In this column, I would like to present the facts (as far as I have learned about the new work permit system) and some relevant comments (based on deductions) of interest to anyone who may be interested in this topic.
 
China will rank foreign workers in A, B and C, starting Nov. 1st, this year, in nine cities and provinces, including Beijing and Shanghai, then nationwide on April 1st (Be aware, CCP does not honor April fools). It is said according to  official sources that the new work permit system is to better serve the overseas talents to work in China, presumably designed to be beneficial to China and the foreign workers. The new system aims to support the nation's drive to promote her economy through technology innovation; hence it will be encouraging the top, regulating the middle and limiting the bottom category of workers to be classified by A,B and C. The official intent is clear and we will discuss more specifics below, however, the implementation details will not be very clear perhaps till next year.
 
The current work permit system consists of two types of permit for foreign employees. One employment license is issued by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the other issued by the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs (SAFEA). The present system does not provide a clear guideline for a foreign specialist; say from IBM, to apply which work permit from which government channel. The new system will consolidate all applications under SAFEA. Consolidating the bureaucracy is a good thing; however, the integration of the evaluation, approval, data digitization and administration steps probably will take time to develop in order to produce a consistent process nationwide based on the point system described below.
 
According to China's most recent official census in 2010, about 200,000 foreigners worked legally in China and perhaps with additional 400,000 were dependents. However, an unofficial estimate quoted by a consultant in HR service business today placed the figure of foreign workers at two million with more than 300,000 working illegally, mostly on tourist visa. As the US illegal immigration issue being high on her presidential election debate list, it is no surprise that the Chinese government is looking ahead to avoid an explosive illegal immigration problem and wants to tighten the control of foreign employees both from economic development point of view and from national security concern. China's minority populations are mostly in the north and the west bordering less developed nations, for example, Inner Mongolia bordering the independent Outer Mongolia presenting a special situation very different from foreign workers say coming from the Western countries or Japan, Korea, Vietnam, India, Singapore or Africa. One may point out that the foreign work permit and immigration policy towards Mongolian deserves special attention from the government, perhaps requiring exceptional rules deviated from the general point system, simply because an ‘affirmative action’ type of work/immigration policy will be helpful for Mongolian integration in China.
 
With China moving towards an internal consumption driven, industry upgrading and innovation stimulated economy, the country needs more talented foreign workers, in state owned enterprises, private companies and foreign corporations operating in China. The new system naturally will streamline the administrative process of foreign work permit application, but it does cause concern among some current foreign workers. For example, an American high school teacher teaching English in a Chinese elementary school is wondering how will teachers be categorized and what kind of scoring system will be used in categorizing teachers into A,B or C work permit?
 
On this teacher's concern, I can offer some relevant comments. It is not the color of the skin or hair or surname or birthplace that is critical in teaching English to Chinese children, it is the other elements, such as cultural background, parenting experience, educational level, teaching methods, of course, plus the fluency and good pronunciation of English that determine a good English teacher (especially to kids). As an example, I would rate an oversea Chinese, Mr. Wang, retired at age of 65 lived and worked forty years in the United States with confidence and desire to teach English in China higher than Mr. Smith, a 25 year old native born American or Britton or Ausie. Sadly, the current value system in China would pay a 25 year old Mr. Smith double the salary than a 65 year old Mr. Wang even Mr. Wang speaks just fluently, having a PhD with more knowledge in history, science, and Chinese culture than Mr. Smith. The sad value system is obviously a result of public perception. The government’s point system must consider the above situation to correct the public perception in order to benefit Chinese children on learning foreign languages. In my opinion, Mr. Smith is better qualified to teach millions of Chinese English teachers who needs to improve or correct their English pronunciation.
 
In a publication by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security in China's Organization Personnel Newspaper, some clarifications of the classification system are given as follows:
A point system will be used to classify work permit (jobs) according to salary, education level, special skills, Chinese language skills, age, etc into three categories: 1. Class A, top professional, innovative and creative talent with 85 points or more; 2. Class B, professionals needed in China's economic development plans, short-term gap fulfillment, including management and technical skills with 60 points or more; and 3. Class C, unskilled and service workers with less than 60 points. There will be limits in class B in international trade, sports, culture and education areas and Class C will be strictly limited. The above point system is what I know so far; I am sure more details will be available nearing its implementation.
 
Logically, a point system is perhaps necessary for administering the millions of foreign workers in China, but the implementation must contain thorough considerations including examples cited above (foreign language teachers and workers with ethnic background same as Chinese minorities). Hopefully, the SAFEA organization bestowed with the work permit responsibility, will keep an open mind to fine tune the system to work for China's needs in tabbing into foreign talents like the U.S. has been benefitted from the talented foreign workers for many decades and not burdened by illegal immigrants. The key is the Chinese government must design a flexible work/immigration policy not only according to China’s industrial and social needs but also must respond to and to some degree dictate China’s reforming education system, where foreign workers are both needed (more in K-12 schools) and produced (more in tertiary schools).  


​

Abstract
​
Nuclear threat from North Korea seems to be unsolvable problem since Nixon first encountered in 1975 till today challenging the Trump Presidency. The U.S. is right about that China may be able to help finding a solution but the U.S. is going about in a wrong way. To find a solution to the ‘Korea Problem’, one must understand the history behind Joseon, her relation with China and how she has evolved into two Koreas today challenging the world as the ‘Korea Nuclear Problem’ as well as facing the reality that nuclear threat can only be rendered ineffective when the three great nuclear powers agree to form a Tri-Party Nuclear Police to deter anyone using nuclear weapon.

_______________________________________________________________________________________
 
I. Reflection and History of Korea and Korea Problem
 
'Korea' problem is an international hot potato that no one seems to have a solution. Koreans, reflected by their leaders and historical events, are characterized by world leaders who had dealt with the Koreans as emotional people with strong and unyielding will. The incidence of North Korea Leader Kim Jong Un of developing nuclear missiles not only threatens South Korea and Japan but also makes the U.S. and China uneasy. The continuous testing of nuclear weapon and the launching of four ballistic missiles by North Korea in recent months have escalated the 'Korea problem’ to a 'hot button' level for the U.S. The U.S. is pressured by South Korea and Japan as well as international community to do something to solve this security challenge. The U.S. is trying to pass on the pressure to China but does the U.S. expect China to have a solution? The North Korea nuclear threat has existed since the Nixon Administration (1975) but no solution has been found up to today’s Trump Administration. This author believes that in order to find a solution to the 'Korea problem’, we must first understand the history of Korea and trace the causality of evolution of the 'Korea' problem then devise a realistic solution. This article will follow this thought process.
 
The two Koreas are neighbors of China today but historically the Korean Peninsula had a very close yet complicated relationship with China, a hate relation with Japan and a divided and confused relation with the U.S. First, centuries before Christ, the Korean Peninsula and northeastern part of China were occupied by the northern people divided in many small states until they merged into three kingdoms, Goguryeo 高句麗， Silla 新羅， and Baekje 百濟. In 678AD, with the help of Tang Dynasty (China), Silla united the three kingdoms but then in 698AD it was split into the North (Balhae) and South (Silla) which was later divided into three kingdoms again (892-936AD). The three kingdoms were united by Wang Geon to form the Goryeo Dynasty (918AD). The Balhae was invaded by Khitan (Liao Dynasty, a brief one in Chinese history) causing the Crown Prince of Balhae and his refugees to join the Goryeo Dynasty, becoming a united dynasty for many centuries thereafter. In 1392, General Yi Seong-Gye through a coup established Joseon Dynasty (1392-1910). It was during this dynasty, King Sejong the Great (1418-1450) created the Hangul alphabet enabling recorded Korean history in Hangul. The Joseon Dynasty suffered foreign invasions (1592-1637) and became more isolated and later in many ways like China suffered a tragic fate owing to Western colonialism and Japanese Imperialism.
 
In 19th century Joseon as a protectorate of Qing Dynasty experienced similar fate as Qing did. They faced the invasion of colonial powers from the West and the aggressive encroachment of the Imperial Japan and victimized by all the unequal treaties forced upon them. After Qing lost in the Sino-Japan War (1894-1895), Qing was forced to sign the infamous Maguan Tiaoyue (1895) to end the war, ceding Taiwan to Japan and acknowledging the independence of Korea Empire by severing its protectorate relation with Qing. Then Japan forced the Korea Empire to sign a protectorate treaty (1905) with her and in 1910 Japan brutally annexed Korea. (160,000 Koreans were killed whereas over 400,000 Chinese were killed in Taiwan by the ruling Japanese) On 4-13-1919, an exile Korea government was established in Shanghai, endorsed by China, then the new Republic of China. However, Japan's ambition in expansion and desire to conquer China had become more vivid eventually leading to an all out invasion war (1937) against China. The young government of the Republic of China was forced to move west to Chongqing and so did the exile Korean government in 1940. 
 
Throughout the Chinese history, the north east of China including Manchuria and Joseon Peninsula had been protectorate of China for sometime as well as threatening neighbors for other times with excursions of invasion into China. The 'northern people' (They are part of minorities of Chinese population today) included then the Joseon people thus the 'northern people' has a complex historical background in Chinese history. In good times, they were China's protectorate and in bad times they were the invaders. From the opposite perspective, some 'Northern People', such as Joseonians even advocate today that their ancestors have ruled China (Some Koreans would claim Manchuria even further into the Middle Kingdom of China were part of Korea). This historical background had great influence on China's Korea policy and laid basis for probable explanation of Korea's flip-flop China relation and off-and-on dependence on China.
 
When WW II ended with Japan surrendered to the Allies (the U.S., the Great Britain, France, Russia and China), and by the Potsdam Declaration, Japan had to give up and return all conquered territories to China. Thus Manchuria and Taiwan were returned to China and Korea was to become independent from Japan. Unfortunately, the post war order could not be restored smoothly due to the emergence of communism (for example, Russia was in northern Manchuria receiving the Japanese surrender instead of China). Post WW II, China broke out a civil war with People's Republic of China controlling the Mainland China in the end and the Republic of China controlling the Taiwan Province of China. Similarly, post WW II, Korea was split to North and South Korea supported by the Soviet Union and the United States respectively. Both China and Korea’s situations were the direct consequence of the anti-communism policy the U.S. adopted and the expansionary policy of the communist Soviet Union. The Korean War (6-25-1950) was one of the major confrontations between the U.S. (supporting South Korea) against the Soviet Union (supporting North Korea). China (especially her generals) then was not willing to fight the superior US forces but Mao had no choice since he was fully aware of the Stalin strategy. Russia would be more than happy to send Russian troops to Korean Peninsula to fight the Americans passing through Chinese northern territories and demanding China to offer local support and supplies to the Russian move to protect North Korea. In 1950, China was still under the devastation of WW II, Mao decided to engage China in the Korean War directly rather than being a puppet behind the Russian troops. He had to commit his own son to boost morale to fight the US modern forces on behalf of the Koreans. (Mao's son was killed during the Korean War) The Chinese fought a bitter battle against a well equipped American army. By sheer man power and will power, they stopped the US advances eventually settled back to the original 38 degree truce line. Thus the world maintained a draw of the Korean conflict between the two sides. China and the U.S. both suffered severe casualty in their respective military history. The U.S. and China fought an unnecessary war for the Koreans. China claimed victory for North Korea and the U.S. for the South Korea but the two Koreas were never appreciative. The 'Korea Problem' thus persisted from the cease fire in 1953 till today. The war was at truce but never ended.
 
II. Searching for the Solution of the ‘Korea Problem’
 
The motives of the U.S. in Korean War is foremost to stop communist from taking over the Korean Peninsula and to a lesser degree to build a nation chain to surround and curtail the communist states. China was a communist state but with her long history rich in ideologies and in political governance, China never accepted communism as the gospel as proven out later by her departure from the Soviet Communist bloc and by her embracing of capitalism and cultivating a system of her own. The motives of China in Korean War was a reactionary one to the US-Soviet confrontation and mostly driven by the objectives of self preservation and desire to build herself into a true independence state. It is an easily understandable foreign policy judging on China’s treacherous revolution history to become a modern independent nation. However, today's situation has changed. The Soviet Union had collapsed. China has risen not only economically but has become more mature and self-confident on the world stage. The U.S., though still a superpower with the strongest military might in the world, must recognize the past decades of globalization which has molded the world into intricate interdependence. The 'Korea Problem' evolved under the prolonged confrontation with North Korea developing nuclear power since 1960’s for nuclear energy purpose then expanded for military applications in late 70’s. China had refused North Korea to share her nuclear technology in 1964 when she succeeded in her first nuclear bomb test.  North Korea always had intention to develop nuclear weapon and the U.S. had always tried to get North Korea to sign a nonproliferation treaty to stop nuclear weapon development. (A brief summary: North Korea did sign a NPT in 1992 but the inspection process would break down. Then threaten to withdraw (1993), negotiation (1994-2002), withdraw from NPT (1-10-2003), begin of six party negotiation (4-2003), re-signed agreement (2005) and breakdown again and continued negotiation (2006-2011), death of Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un taking control (12-2011) and now the recent increased testing and launching (2012-present) )
 
This nuclear threat has impact on not only the two Korea Peninsula states but also Japan, China, Russia and the U.S (by her military alliances with South Korea and Japan). This 'Korea Problem' has challenged the U.S. from the Nixon-Kissinger era (1970-1975) through Obama to Trump Presidency. What is the solution? None! The problem has escalated as North Korea gained more in nuclear and missile technology. According to the US National Security Archive released in 2010, Nixon had pondered on launching a pre-emptive nuclear strike on North Korea, but the consequence would be neither predictable nor acceptable judging on the possible behavior of the Korean leaders. Up to today, North Korea had conducted its first hydrogen bomb on Janurary 6,  2016 and its fifth underground nuclear test with an estimated yield of 10kt on July 6,  2016 and the above mentioned ballistic missile launch on March 6, 2017. The 'Korea Problem' thus has become a more dangerous thorny issue. However thorny, we must find a solution, mustn't we?!
 
Kim Jong Un, out of his frustration in managing his country's economic problems (more likely a survival issue), took nuclear power development as the adrenaline shot. But nuclear missiles are not rice and bread nor fuel and commodities needed by the North Koreans. Nuclear missiles may be a threat but launching one requires a clear minded resolve to pick a target. First, which and where is the target? Second, would a pre-emptive strike succeed? If the U.S. couldnot easily arrive at such a resolve, it would be more difficult for North Korea to arrive at a clear effective resolve for sure. Should North Korea first attack Soule (capital of South Korea) or Japan or a US military base or China and Russia's military bases? It would be an impossible resolution to make if the U.S., China, Russia, Japan and South Korea were all truly united in dealing with the 'Korea Problem'. This is the very reason, China believes in a six party negotiation as the only solution to resolve the 'Korea Problem'. If the U.S. could work with China and Russia on this 'Korea Problem, the problem would disappear. Let me explain why.
 
From the legacy US foreign policy, the U.S. is treating Russia and China, two nuclear powers, as threats to the U.S. and the world. Based on this policy, the U.S. is essentially facing two 'nuclear threats' with magnitude larger than the 'Korea Problem'. If the U.S. could not solve the Korea problem how would The U.S. solve the Russia or China problem? The current strategy of placing THAAD in South Korea over the objections of China and Russia would not change the two bigger nuclear threats at all. THAAD may be effective in deterring North Korean missiles but it will not be able to deter Russia or China both of which have a large land mass and huge ocean territory to launch nuclear missiles. So the fundamental strategic thinking about nuclear threat must change. The only workable strategy seems to be pursuing an across the board de-nuclear plan among the three biggest nuclear powers. If the United States, Russia and China would agree with this principle, then any small 'nuclear threat or problem' could be solved, since the small threat had no way to succeed in any pre-emptive strike against the U.S., Russia and China. If the three great nations would sign a nuclear war prevention agreement (NWPA), that is, if any nation was found to develop nuclear weapon with intent to launch such weapon against any other nation, anyone of the three nuclear powers could take a retaliate nuclear strike to annihilate the nuclear attacker’s nuclear facility. This NWPA basically establishes a tri-party nuclear police (TPNP) which will be the solution to the 'Korea Problem', 'Iran Problem' or any other nuclear ambition.
 
Following the above concept, we may find a lasting solution for the ‘Korea Problem’ by taking the following steps:
 
The U.S. immediately initiates a discussion to develop a NWPA establishing the tri-part nuclear police mechanism. With such an agreement reached, the U.S. can withdraw all military forces including any nuclear weapon from South Korea and demanding the North Korean to stop and destroy its nuclear power development. What can North Korea do? Attack South Korea to invite a total destruction from the Tri-Party police? To defy the tri-party nuclear police and to invite a severe sanction punishment? This Tri-Party Nuclear Police will render the ‘North Korea’ nuclear threat ineffective.  This tri-party nuclear police will also eliminate Japan's excuse of building an ambitious nuclear power. This TPNP can take away any incentive for any nation to start a military nuclear power program. If the three great nations cannot reach a NWPA and TPNP mechanism, the consequence is clear – nuclear threats cannot be stopped, “Korea Problem’ or any other nuclear threat will lead to a nuclear war destroying the entire Earth including the three great nations.